2014 Lancer Gt 0 60
Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 times
Love the feeling of your back being squizzed to the seat and eager to know Lancer 0-60 Times? We will feed your curiosity in this subject. Learn more about the Lancer's top speed acceleration from 0-60 MPH. You may compare Lancer 0-60 time evolution across all the trims and years. Also, consider Mitsubishi Lancer quarter mile performance specs.
Comparing cars is a real fun. Since 0-60 time has been considered the golden standard of cars' performance, let's put Lancer face to face with the rivals by analyzing 0 to 60 mph, 60 to 80 mph and a quarter mile acceleration data.
We've created a convenient proprietary Lancer 0-60 time calculations that we base on the most accurate sources, including the manufacturer's manuals. While the data are estimates, they'll help you to make the right comparisons. You can now conveniently check out detailed, exact statistics on Lancer 0-60 times across as many models and years as you want.
Although you may never ever reach the official Lancer 0-60 times, it's at least the perfect indicator of the engine's power. For your own convenience, we've also provided accurate 0-60 video reviews from the Lancer dashboards. And furthermore, we listen to the sound of your vehicle's engine and determine the noise of the exhaust pipe.
2017 Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 Times
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
| SE 4dr AWC Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 23 City / 30 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 7.9 sec, 16.2 @ 91 |
| ES 4dr AWC Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 23 City / 30 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 7.9 sec, 16.2 @ 91 |
| SEL 4dr AWC Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 23 City / 30 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 7.9 sec, 16.2 @ 91 |
| ES 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 148 Hp, 145 Lb-Ft., 2888lbs Weight, 24 City / 33 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, front-wheel, 5-spd man transmission | 8.2 sec, 16.3 @ 89 |
2016 Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 Times
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
| SE 4dr AWC Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 23 City / 31 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 7.9 sec, 16.2 @ 90 |
| ES 4dr AWC Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 23 City / 31 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 7.9 sec, 16.2 @ 91 |
| SEL 4dr AWC Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 23 City / 31 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 7.9 sec, 16.2 @ 90 |
| ES 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 148 Hp, 145 Lb-Ft., 2888lbs Weight, 24 City / 34 Hwy mpg, 4-wheel disc, front-wheel, 5-spd man transmission | 8.2 sec, 16.3 @ 89 |
2015 Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 Times
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
| Ralliart 4dr All-wheel Drive Sedan 237 Hp, 253 Lb-Ft., intercooled turbo, 3461lbs Weight, 4-wheel disc, all wheel, 6-spd auto-shift man transmission | 5.7 sec, 14.4 @ 94 |
| GT 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 2966lbs Weight, 4-wheel disc, front-wheel, 5-spd man transmission | 8 sec, 16 @ 87 |
| SE 4dr 4WD Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight, 4-wheel disc, four-wheel, 6-spd CVT transmission | 8 sec, 16.1 @ 86 |
| ES 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 148 Hp, 145 Lb-Ft., 2888lbs Weight, front disc/rear drum, front-wheel, 5-spd man transmission | 8.2 sec, 16.3 @ 89 |
2014 Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 Times
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
| Ralliart 4dr All-wheel Drive Sedan 237 Hp, 253 Lb-Ft., 3461lbs Weight | 5.7 sec, 14.4 @ 94 |
| GT 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 2966lbs Weight | 7.5 sec, 15.7 @ 92 |
| SE 4dr 4WD Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3142lbs Weight | 8 sec, 16.1 @ 86 |
| ES 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 148 Hp, 145 Lb-Ft., 2888lbs Weight | 8.2 sec, 16.3 @ 89 |
2013 Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 Times
| Trim | 0-60 times, 1/4 mile |
| Ralliart 4dr All-wheel Drive Sedan 237 Hp, 253 Lb-Ft., 3461lbs Weight | 5.7 sec, 14.4 @ 94 |
| GT 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 2966lbs Weight | 7.5 sec, 15.7 @ 92 |
| SE 4dr 4WD Sedan 168 Hp, 167 Lb-Ft., 3120lbs Weight | 7.9 sec, 16.1 @ 87 |
| DE 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 148 Hp, 145 Lb-Ft., 2866lbs Weight | 8.1 sec, 16.2 @ 89 |
| ES 4dr Front-wheel Drive Sedan 148 Hp, 145 Lb-Ft., 2866lbs Weight | 8.1 sec, 16.2 @ 89 |
Mitsubishi Lancer 0-60 Times
| Year of a Model | 0-60 times | 1/4 mile times |
| 2017 | 7.9 - 8.2 sec | 16.2 @ 91 - 16.3 @ 89 mph |
| 2016 | 7.9 - 8.2 sec | 16.2 @ 91 - 16.3 @ 89 mph |
| 2015 | 5.7 - 8.2 sec | 14.4 @ 94 - 16.3 @ 86 mph |
| 2014 | 5.7 - 8.2 sec | 14.4 @ 94 - 16.3 @ 86 mph |
| 2013 | 5.7 - 8.1 sec | 14.4 @ 94 - 16.2 @ 87 mph |
| 2012 | 5.7 - 8.1 sec | 14.4 @ 94 - 16.2 @ 87 mph |
| 2011 | 5.7 - 8.2 sec | 14.4 @ 94 - 16.3 @ 89 mph |
| 2010 | 6.8 - 7.9 sec | 14.9 @ 94 - 16.1 @ 90 mph |
| 2009 | 6.5 - 8 sec | 14.7 @ 93 - 16.2 @ 90 mph |
| 2008 | 8 sec | 16.2 @ 90 mph |
| 2006 | 8.2 - 9.3 sec | 16.1 @ 86 - 17.2 @ 81 mph |
| 2005 | 8.1 - 9.7 sec | 16 @ 86 - 17.1 @ 82 mph |
| 2004 | 8.1 - 10.4 sec | 16 @ 86 - 17.8 @ 77 mph |
| 2003 | 9.7 - 10.2 sec | 17.1 @ 82 - 17.7 @ 78 mph |
| 2002 | 9.2 - 10.1 sec | 17.7 @ 0 - 18.6 @ 0 mph |
Mitsubishi Lancer competitors' 0-60
-
Volkswagen Golf 0-60
- 0-60 5.6 sec
- quarter mile 15.9 @ 0 mph
-
Subaru WRX STI 0-60
- 0-60 5.6 sec
- quarter mile -
-
Mazda Mazda3 0-60
- 0-60 5.9 - 8.1 sec
- quarter mile 14.5 @ 0 - 16 @ 0 mph
-
Ford Focus ST 0-60
- 0-60 5.9 sec
- quarter mile 14.6 @ 95 mph
-
Subaru WRX 0-60
- 0-60 6 sec
- quarter mile -
-
Hyundai Veloster 0-60
- 0-60 6.2 sec
- quarter mile 14.8 @ 0 mph
-
Hyundai Elantra 0-60
- 0-60 7 - 8.4 sec
- quarter mile 16.5 @ 0 mph
-
Honda Civic 0-60
- 0-60 7.4 - 7.9 sec
- quarter mile 15.7 @ 0 mph
-
Ford Focus 0-60
- 0-60 7.5 - 8.3 sec
- quarter mile 16.2 @ 90 - 16.3 @ 85 mph
-
Volkswagen Jetta 0-60
- 0-60 7.7 sec
- quarter mile 16 @ 0 mph
-
Toyota Corolla 0-60
- 0-60 7.8 sec
- quarter mile 16.3 @ 0 mph
-
Chevrolet Cruze 0-60
- 0-60 8.1 sec
- quarter mile 16.1 @ 0 mph
-
Dodge Dart 0-60
- 0-60 8.1 - 8.8 sec
- quarter mile 15.9 @ 88 - 16.5 @ 83 mph
-
Nissan Sentra 0-60
- 0-60 8.9 sec
- quarter mile 16.6 @ 0 mph
-
Subaru Impreza 0-60
- 0-60 9 - 9.7 sec
- quarter mile 16.6 @ 0 - 16.9 @ 0 mph
-
Scion iM 0-60
- 0-60 9.2 sec
- quarter mile 17.1 @ 81 mph
-
Kia Forte 0-60
- 0-60 9.5 sec
- quarter mile 16.2 @ 0 mph
-
Chevrolet Cruze Limited 0-60
- 0-60 9.5 - 10.3 sec
- quarter mile 17.4 @ 80 - 17.6 @ 72 mph
Cars with the same 0-60 time
| 2017 Hyundai Sonata | 0-60 times 7.9 sec | 1/4 mile 16.2 sec @ 88 |
| 2017 Jaguar XF | 0-60 times 7.9 sec | 1/4 mile 16.6 sec @ 87 |
| 2017 Mazda Mazda3 | 0-60 times 7.9 sec | 1/4 mile 16.2 sec @ 88 |
| 2017 RAM 2500 | 0-60 times 7.9 sec | 1/4 mile 16.1 sec @ 88 |
| 2017 RAM ProMaster 2500 | 0-60 times 7.9 sec | 1/4 mile 16.3 sec @ 89 |
| 2017 RAM ProMaster 3500 | 0-60 times 7.9 sec | 1/4 mile 16.2 sec @ 89 |
Do you want to earn a few bragging rights? It's simple. Simply test your Mitsubishi Lancer accelerations time, of course, in a hands-free as well as fully automated way. What's more, post the Lancer 0-60 time to your leaderboard.
The leaderboard will feature accuracy to the millisecond and display your position in comparison to other users in real time. Also, it'll save for you lots of acceleration times from various models.
The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer is in its 11th year of production for the U.S. market. This makes it the oldest compact sedan. It is offered in 5 trims: the base ES, ES AWC, SE, and the higher SEL variant. The last three versions come with a standard all-wheel-drive system.
The Lancer has received a few upgrades since its launch. However, its main selling point is offering buyers value for their money. This value has been offered for a long time at the expense of competitive fuel consumption ratings and a good interior. The exterior also looks traditional and makes the Lancer a somewhat backward car in a world where manufacturers opt for fastback lines for better aerodynamics.
The base ES model comes with front-wheel-drive. It is powered by a 2.0-liter inline-4 engine that makes 148 horsepower. The power is transmitted through a 5-speed-manual transmission or a continuously variable transmission (CVT) redesigned for better fuel economy and performance. The 2.0-liter strains to work with the CVT and is perky with the 5-speed manual. It's also quite noisy.
The other four trims carry a 2.4-liter inline-4 engine that makes 168 horses. It is mounted on a CVT which comes as standard. The system is an all-wheel-drive that's similar to the one found in the Outlander Sport compact SUV. Upper trims release more torque and power that drive the sedan more confidently.
The Lancer is sportier and drives better than a majority of the small compacts within the market. Beyond the noise, it offers a responsive and smooth drive with pleasant steering.
The base ES Lancer features air conditioning, fog lights, heated power mirrors equipped with turn indicators, 16-inch alloy wheels, voice-activated cell phone and audio controls, and LED daytime running lights. The 2017 models come with a rearview camera as standard and an upgraded audio system. The 2.4-liter found in the ES AWC trim is larger and features an all-wheel-drive system.
For consumers, the mid-grade SE and the well-tuned ES variants will be a favorite. The former adds ventilated disc brakes, air conditioning, steering-wheel audio controls, stabilizer bars, keyless entry, split-folding rear seats, and 18-inch alloy wheels. The Sun and Sound package adds a premium sound system and sunroof to the SE and SEL variants.
In addition to value, buyers get a pleasant and calm driving experience. There are, however, plenty of better-performing models from other manufacturers.
The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer doesn't shy away from its age. It's noisy on the road, has poor gas mileage and looks cheap. In 2016, it got an upgraded continuously variable automatic transmission, a front-end overhaul, and other new standard features. The rearview camera and 6.1-inch touchscreen that came as an option are now standard.
A quick comparison with other models will reveal to you that the Lancer is indeed a car that's behind time. For a daily commuter, the car is difficult to live with. It lacks the zeal experienced in competing models and lacks modern technological features. The Honda Civic is a much better option for a small sedan. Other models that perform and behave better include the Mazda 3, Hyundai Elantra, Subaru Impreza, and the Kia Forte.
Written by William Mutugi
Source: https://autofiles.com/0-60-times/mitsubishi/lancer/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar